Classical Mechanics: Definition, Systems, Equations and Solved Questions
classical mechanics questions and answers pdf, Classical DYNAMICS of particles and SYSTEMS, History of classical mechanics. Examples.
Classical Mechanics
1.1 NEWTONIAN MECHANICS
In the mechanics of Sir Isaac Newton, the equations of motion are obtained from one of Newton's Laws of Motion: Change of motion is proportional to the applied force and takes place in the direction of the force. Force, \(\vec{F}\), is a vector that is equal to the mass of the particle, \(m\), multiplied by the acceleration vector \(\vec{a}\).
\( \vec{F} = m\vec{a} \) (1-1)
If the resultant force acting on the particle is known, then the equation of motion (i.e., trajectory) for the particle can be obtained. The acceleration is the second time derivative of position, \(q\), which is represented as
\( \vec{a} = \frac{d^2q}{dt^2} = \ddot{q} \) (1-2)
The symbol \(q\) is used as a general symbol for position expressed in any inertial coordinate system such as Cartesian, polar, or spherical. A double dot on top of a symbol, such as \(\ddot{q}\), represents the second derivative with respect to time, and a single dot over a symbol represents the first derivative with respect to time.
\( \dot{q} = \frac{dq}{dt} \)
The systems considered, until later in the text, will be conservative systems, and masses will be considered to be point masses. If a force is a function of position only (i.e., no time dependence), then the force is said to be conservative. In conservative systems, the sum of the kinetic and potential energy remains constant throughout the motion. Non-conservative systems, that is, those for which the force has time dependence, are usually of a dissipation type, such as friction or air resistance. Masses will be assumed to have no volume but exist at a given point in space.
Example 1-1
Problem: Determine the trajectory of a projectile fired from a cannon whereby the muzzle is at an angle \(\alpha\) from the horizontal x-axis and leaves the muzzle with a velocity of \(v_m\). Assume that there is no air resistance.
Solution: This problem is an example of a separable problem: the equations of motion can be solved independently in the horizontal and vertical coordinates. First, the forces acting on the particle must be obtained in the two independent coordinates.Horizontal axis (x-axis): \(F_x = m\ddot{x} = 0\)
Vertical axis (y-axis): \(F_y = m\ddot{y} = -mg\)
The forces generate two differential equations to be solved. Upon integration, this results in the following trajectories for the particle along the x and y-axes:
\(\ddot{x} = 0;\) \(x(t) = x_0 + (v_m \cos \alpha)t\)
\(\ddot{y} = -g;\) \(y(t) = y_0 + (v_m \sin \alpha)t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2\)
The constant \(x_0\) and \(y_0\) represent the projectile at the origin (i.e., initial time).
1.2 HAMILTONIAN MECHANICS
An alternative approach to solving mechanical problems that makes some problems more tractable was first introduced in 1834 by the Scottish mathematician Sir William R. Hamilton. In this approach, the Hamiltonian, \(H\), is obtained from the kinetic energy, \(T\), and the potential energy, \(V\), of the particles in a conservative system.
\( H = T + V \) (1-3)
The kinetic energy is expressed as the dot product of the momentum vector, \(\vec{p}\), divided by two times the mass of each particle in the system.
\( T = \sum \frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{p}}{2m} = \sum \frac{p^2}{2m} \) (1-4)
The potential energy of the particles will depend on the positions of the particles. Hamilton determined that for a generalized coordinate system, the equations of motion could be obtained from the Hamiltonian and from the following identities:
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial q_j}\right) = -\dot{p}_j \) (1-5)
and
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_j}\right) = \dot{q}_j \) (1-6)
Simultaneous solution of these differential equations through all of the coordinates in the system will result in the trajectories for the particles.
Example 1-2
Problem: Solve the same problem as shown in Example 1-1 using Hamiltonian mechanics.
Solution: The first step is to determine the Hamiltonian for the problem. The problem is still separable and the projectile will have kinetic energy in both the x and y-axes. The potential energy of the particle is due to gravitational potential energy given as \(V = mgy\).\( H(x,y,p_x,p_y) = T + V = \frac{p_x^2}{2m} + \frac{p_y^2}{2m} + mgy \)
Now, the Hamilton identities in Equations 1-5 and 1-6 must be determined for this system.
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial x}\right)_{p_x,p_y} = 0 = -\dot{p}_x \)
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_x}\right)_{p_x,p_y} = \frac{p_x}{m} = \dot{x} \)
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial y}\right)_{p_x,p_y} = mg = -\dot{p}_y \)
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_y}\right)_{p_x,p_y} = \frac{p_y}{m} = \dot{y} \)
The above formulations result in two non-trivial differential equations that are the same as obtained in Example 1-1 using Newtonian mechanics.
\(\dot{x} = 0\) \(\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad\) \(\dot{y} = -g\)
This will result in the same trajectory as obtained in Example 1-1.
\(x(t) = x_0 + (v_m \cos \alpha)t\)
\(y(t) = y_0 + (v_m \sin \alpha)t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2\)
Notice:
that in Hamiltonian mechanics, initially the momentum of the particles is treated separately from the position of the particles. This method of treating the momentum separately from position will prove useful in quantum mechanics.
1.3 THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR
The harmonic oscillator is an important model problem in chemical systems to describe the oscillatory (vibrational) motion along the bonds between the atoms in a molecule. In this model, the bond is viewed as a spring with a force constant of \(k\).
Consider a spring with a force constant \(k\) such that one end of the spring is attached to an immovable object such as a wall and the other is attached to a mass, \(m\) (see Figure 1-1). Hamiltonian mechanics will be used; hence, the first step is to determine the Hamiltonian for the problem. The mass is confined to the x-axis and will have both kinetic and potential energy. The potential energy is the square of the distance the spring is displaced from its equilibrium position, \(x_0\), times one-half of the spring force constant, \(k\) (Hooke's Law).
\( H = \frac{p_x^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2 \) (1-7)
Taking the derivative of the Hamiltonian (Equation 1-7) with respect to position and applying Equation 1-5 yields:
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial x}\right)_p = k(x - x_0) = -\dot{p} \)
Taking the derivative of the Hamiltonian (Equation 1-7) with respect to momentum and applying Equation 1-6 yields:
\( \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p}\right)_x = \frac{p}{m} = \dot{x} \)
The second differential equation yields a trivial result:
\( \frac{p}{m} = \dot{x} = \ddot{x}; \)
however, the first differential equation can be used to determine the trajectory of the mass \(m\). The time derivative of momentum is equivalent to the force, or mass times acceleration.
\( \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}\left(m\frac{dx}{dt}\right) = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = -k(x - x_0) \) (1-8a)
or
\( \ddot{x} = -\frac{k}{m}(x - x_0) \) (1-8b)
The solution to this differential equation is well known. One solution is given below.
\( x(t) = x_0 + a\sin(\omega t) + b\cos(\omega t) \) (1-9)
Another mathematically equivalent solution can be found by utilizing the following Euler identities (\(i = \sqrt{-1}\)):
\( e^{ix} = \cos x + i\sin x \) (1-10a)
and
\( e^{-ix} = \cos x - i\sin x \) (1-10b)
This results in the following mathematically equivalent trajectory as in Equation 1-9:
\( x(t) = x_0 + Ae^{i\omega t} + Be^{-i\omega t} \) (1-11)
The value of \(x_0\) is the equilibrium length of the spring. Since the product of \(\omega t\) must be dimensionless, the constant \(\omega\) must have units of inverse time and must be the frequency of oscillation. By taking the second time derivative of either Equation 1-9 or 1-11 results in the following expression:
\( \ddot{x} = -\omega^2(x(t) - x_0) \) (1-12)
By comparing Equation 1-12 with Equation 1-8b, an expression for \(\omega\) is readily obtained.
\( \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} \) (1-13)
Since the sine and cosine functions will oscillate from +1 to -1, the constants \(a\) and \(b\) in Equation 1-9 and likewise the constants \(A\) and \(B\) in Equation 1-11 are related to the amplitude and phase of motion of the mass. There are no constraints on the values of these constants, and the system is not quantized.
Chemical Connection
A diatomic molecule approximates the model just discussed such that the mass of one atom is much larger than the other atom: such as hydrogen bromide. In infrared spectroscopy, the absorbed infrared radiation results in transitions in both the vibrational and rotational states of a molecule. Considering only the vibrational transitions, what would an infrared spectrum of hydrogen bromide look like based on the classical result? According to classical mechanics, would infrared spectroscopy be a useful tool in chemistry?
A model can now be developed that more accurately describes a diatomic molecule. Consider two masses, \(m_1\) and \(m_2\), separated by a spring with a force constant \(k\) and an equilibrium length of \(x_0\) as shown in Figure 1-2. The Hamiltonian is shown below.
\( H(x_1,x_2,p_1,p_2) = \frac{p_1^2}{2m_1} + \frac{p_2^2}{2m_2} + \frac{1}{2}k(x_2 - x_1 - x_0)^2 \)
Note:
that the Hamiltonian appears to be inseparable. Making a coordinate transformation to a center-of-mass coordinate system can make this problem separable. Define \(r\) as the displacement of the spring from its equilibrium position and \(s\) as the position of the center of mass..
\( r = x_2 - x_1 - x_0 \)
\( s = \frac{m_1x_1 + m_2x_2}{m_1 + m_2} \)
As a result of the coordinate transformation, the potential energy for the system becomes:
\( V = \frac{1}{2}kr^2 \)
Now the momentum \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) must be transformed to the momentum in the \(s\) and \(r\) coordinates. The time derivatives of \(r\) and \(s\) must be taken and related to the time derivatives of \(x_1\) and \(x_2\).
\( \dot{r} = \dot{x}_2 - \dot{x}_1 \) (1-14)
\( \dot{s} = \frac{m_1\dot{x}_1 + m_2\dot{x}_2}{m_1 + m_2} \) (1-15)
From Equations 1-14 and 1-15, expressions for \(\dot{x}_1\) and \(\dot{x}_2\) in terms of \(\dot{s}\) and \(\dot{r}\) can be obtained.
\( \dot{x}_1 = \dot{s} - \frac{m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\dot{r} \) (1-16)
\( \dot{x}_2 = \dot{s} + \frac{m_1}{m_1 + m_2}\dot{r} \) (1-17)
The momentum terms \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) are now expressed in terms of the center of mass coordinates \(s\) and \(r\).
\( p_1 = m_1\dot{x}_1 = m_1\dot{s} - m_1\frac{m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\dot{r} \)
\( p_2 = m_2\dot{x}_2 = m_2\dot{s} + m_2\frac{m_1}{m_1 + m_2}\dot{r} \)
The reduced mass of the system, \(\mu\), is defined as
\( \mu = \frac{m_1m_2}{m_1 + m_2} \)
This reduces the expressions for \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) to the following:
\( p_1 = m_1\dot{s} - \mu\dot{r} \)
and
\( p_2 = m_2\dot{s} + \mu\dot{r} \)
The Hamiltonian can now be written in terms of the center-of-mass coordinate system.
\( H(r, s, p_r, p_s) = \frac{p_r^2}{2m_1} + \frac{p_s^2}{2m_2} +
\frac{1}{2}kr^2 = \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{(m_1+m_2)^2}{(m_1+m_2)}\dot{s}^2 + \frac{1}{\mu}\dot{r}^2\right] + \frac{1}{2}kr^2 \)
A further simplification can be made to the Hamiltonian by recognizing that the total mass of the system, \(M\), is the sum of \(m_1\) and \(m_2\) (i.e., \(M = m_1 + m_2\)).
\( H(r, s, p_r, p_s) = \frac{p_s^2}{2M} + \frac{p_r^2}{2\mu} + \frac{1}{2}kr^2 \) (1-18)
Recall that the coordinate \(s\) corresponds to the center of mass of the system whereas the coordinate \(r\) corresponds to the displacement of the spring. This ensures that \(r\) and \(s\) are separable. It can be concluded that the kinetic energy term
\( \frac{p_s^2}{2M} \)
must correspond to the translation of the entire system in space. Since it is the vibrational motion that is of interest, the kinetic term for the translation of the system can be neglected in the Hamiltonian. The resulting Hamiltonian that corresponds to the vibrational motion is as follows:
\( H(r, p_r) = \frac{p_r^2}{2\mu} + \frac{1}{2}kr^2 \) (1-19)
Notice:
that the Hamiltonian in Equation 1-19 is identical in form to the Hamiltonian in Equation 1-7 solved previously. The solution can be inferred from the previous result recognizing that when the spring is in its equilibrium position \(x_0\), then \(r=0\) (refer to Equation 1-14).
\( r(t) = a\sin(\omega t) + b\cos(\omega t) = Ae^{i\omega t} + Be^{-i\omega t} \) (1-20)
\( \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu}} \) (1-21)
This example demonstrates a number of important techniques in solving mechanical problems. A mechanical problem can at times be made separable by an appropriate coordinate transformation. This will prove especially useful in solving problems that involve circular motion where coordinates can be made separable by transforming Cartesian coordinates to polar or spherical coordinates. Another more subtle point is to learn to recognize a Hamiltonian to which you know the solution. In chemical systems, the Hamiltonian of a molecule will often have components similar to other molecules or model problems for which the solution is known. The ability to recognize these components will prove important to solving many of these systems.
PROBLEMS AND EXERCISES
- Initial velocity: \(v_0 = 10.0 \, \text{m/s}\)
- Launch angle: \(\theta = 30.0^\circ\)
- Acceleration due to gravity: \(g = 9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2\)
We need to find the time of flight (\(t\)) and then use it to calculate the horizontal range (\(R\)).
The vertical component of initial velocity is \(v_{0y} = v_0 \sin \theta\).
The horizontal component of initial velocity is \(v_{0x} = v_0 \cos \theta\).
To find the time of flight, we consider the vertical motion. The projectile hits the ground when its vertical displacement is zero (assuming it starts and ends at the same height).
\(y(t) = v_{0y}t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2 = 0\)
\(t(v_{0y} - \frac{1}{2}gt) = 0\)
The two solutions are \(t=0\) (start) and \(t = \frac{2v_{0y}}{g}\).
\(t = \frac{2 \times (10.0 \, \text{m/s}) \times \sin(30.0^\circ)}{9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2} = \frac{2 \times 10.0 \times 0.5}{9.8} = \frac{10.0}{9.8} \approx 1.02 \, \text{s}\)
Now, calculate the range using the horizontal motion:
\(R = v_{0x}t = (v_0 \cos \theta)t\)
\(R = (10.0 \, \text{m/s}) \times \cos(30.0^\circ) \times 1.02 \, \text{s}\)
\(R = 10.0 \times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \times 1.02 \approx 10.0 \times 0.866 \times 1.02 \approx 8.83 \, \text{m}\)
Answer: The range of the projectile is approximately 8.83 meters.1.2) Using Hamiltonian mechanics, determine the time it will take a 1.00 kg block initially at rest to slide down a 1.00 m long frictionless ramp that has an angle of 45.0° from the horizontal axis.
- Mass: \(m = 1.00 \, \text{kg}\)
- Ramp length: \(L = 1.00 \, \text{m}\)
- Ramp angle: \(\theta = 45.0^\circ\)
- Initial velocity: \(v_0 = 0 \, \text{m/s}\)
The component of gravitational force along the incline is \(F_{\text{parallel}} = mg \sin \theta\).
Using Newton's second law (\(F=ma\)), the acceleration along the incline is:
\(a = \frac{F_{\text{parallel}}}{m} = \frac{mg \sin \theta}{m} = g \sin \theta\)
\(a = (9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2) \times \sin(45.0^\circ) = 9.8 \times \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \approx 9.8 \times 0.707 \approx 6.93 \, \text{m/s}^2\)
Now, we can use a kinematic equation to find the time (\(t\)) it takes to travel the length of the ramp (\(L\)), starting from rest:
\(L = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2\)
Since \(v_0 = 0\):
\(L = \frac{1}{2}at^2\)
\(t^2 = \frac{2L}{a}\)
\(t = \sqrt{\frac{2L}{a}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 1.00 \, \text{m}}{6.93 \, \text{m/s}^2}} = \sqrt{\frac{2.00}{6.93}} \approx \sqrt{0.2886} \approx 0.537 \, \text{s}\)
Answer: It will take approximately 0.537 seconds for the block to slide down the ramp.
The kinetic energy for a particle moving in three dimensions is \(T = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2)\).
In terms of momentum, this is \(T = \frac{p_x^2}{2m} + \frac{p_y^2}{2m} + \frac{p_z^2}{2m}\), where \(p_x = m\dot{x}\), \(p_y = m\dot{y}\), and \(p_z = m\dot{z}\).
The potential energy is given as \(V(x,y,z) = mgy\).
The Hamiltonian is \(H = T + V\):
\(H(x,y,z,p_x,p_y,p_z) = \frac{p_x^2}{2m} + \frac{p_y^2}{2m} + \frac{p_z^2}{2m} + mgy\)
Now, we use Hamilton's equations (1-5 and 1-6) for each coordinate:
For the x-dimension:
\(q_j = x\), \(p_j = p_x\)
\(\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial x}\right)_{p_x,p_y,p_z} = 0\)
From (1-5): \(0 = -\dot{p}_x \implies \dot{p}_x = 0\)
From (1-6): \(\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_x}\right)_{p_x,p_y,p_z} = \frac{p_x}{m}\)
So, \(\frac{p_x}{m} = \dot{x}\). This gives \(p_x = m\dot{x}\), which is the definition of momentum in the x-direction. The equation of motion is \(\dot{p}_x = 0\), which means \(p_x\) is constant, and thus \(\dot{x}\) is constant.
For the y-dimension:
\(q_j = y\), \(p_j = p_y\)
\(\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial y}\right)_{p_x,p_y,p_z} = mg\)
From (1-5): \(mg = -\dot{p}_y \implies \dot{p}_y = -mg\)
From (1-6): \(\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_y}\right)_{p_x,p_y,p_z} = \frac{p_y}{m}\)
So, \(\frac{p_y}{m} = \dot{y}\). This gives \(p_y = m\dot{y}\), which is the definition of momentum in the y-direction. The equation of motion is \(\dot{p}_y = -mg\). Since \(\dot{p}_y = m\ddot{y}\), we have \(m\ddot{y} = -mg\), which simplifies to \(\ddot{y} = -g\).
For the z-dimension:
\(q_j = z\), \(p_j = p_z\)
\(\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial z}\right)_{p_x,p_y,p_z} = 0\)
From (1-5): \(0 = -\dot{p}_z \implies \dot{p}_z = 0\)
From (1-6): \(\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_z}\right)_{p_x,p_y,p_z} = \frac{p_z}{m}\)
So, \(\frac{p_z}{m} = \dot{z}\). This gives \(p_z = m\dot{z}\), which is the definition of momentum in the z-direction. The equation of motion is \(\dot{p}_z = 0\), which means \(p_z\) is constant, and thus \(\dot{z}\) is constant.
Equations of Motion:
- \(\ddot{x} = 0\)
- \(\ddot{y} = -g\)
- \(\ddot{z} = 0\)
Solution: The angular frequency (\(\omega\)) of a harmonic oscillator is related to the force constant (\(k\)) and the mass (\(m\)) by the formula:
\( \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} \)
We are given the oscillation frequency, which is usually interpreted as the linear frequency (\(f\)), not the angular frequency (\(\omega\)). The relationship is \(\omega = 2\pi f\).
Given frequency \(f = 50 \, \text{sec}^{-1}\).
So, \(\omega = 2\pi \times 50 \, \text{sec}^{-1} = 100\pi \, \text{rad/s}\).
We can rearrange the formula to solve for \(k\):
\( k = m\omega^2 \)
a) For \(m = 0.100 \, \text{kg}\):
\(k = (0.100 \, \text{kg}) \times (100\pi \, \text{rad/s})^2 = 0.100 \times 10000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m} = 1000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m}\)
\(k \approx 1000 \times (3.14159)^2 \approx 1000 \times 9.8696 \approx 9870 \, \text{N/m}\)
b) For \(m = 1.00 \, \text{kg}\):
\(k = (1.00 \, \text{kg}) \times (100\pi \, \text{rad/s})^2 = 1.00 \times 10000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m} = 10000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m}\)
\(k \approx 10000 \times 9.8696 \approx 98700 \, \text{N/m}\)
c) For \(m = 10.0 \, \text{kg}\):
\(k = (10.0 \, \text{kg}) \times (100\pi \, \text{rad/s})^2 = 10.0 \times 10000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m} = 100000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m}\)
\(k \approx 100000 \times 9.8696 \approx 986960 \, \text{N/m}\)
d) For \(m = 100. \, \text{kg}\):
\(k = (100. \, \text{kg}) \times (100\pi \, \text{rad/s})^2 = 100. \times 10000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m} = 1000000\pi^2 \, \text{N/m}\)
\(k \approx 1000000 \times 9.8696 \approx 9869600 \, \text{N/m}\)
Answers:
a) \(k \approx 9870 \, \text{N/m}\)
b) \(k \approx 98700 \, \text{N/m}\)
c) \(k \approx 987000 \, \text{N/m}\)
d) \(k \approx 9.87 \times 10^6 \, \text{N/m}\)
This question has inconsistent units for the force constant. Typically, a force constant is measured in N/m or kg/s2. Assuming "kg sec-2" is meant to imply units compatible with the formula and likely a typo for kg/s2 or that the mass is implicitly 1 kg to produce these units, let's proceed by assuming the force constant is \(k=1607\) in some consistent unit system.
If we assume \(k = 1607 \, \text{N/m}\) (which is a standard unit for force constant), we need the reduced mass of the \(^{14}\text{N}^{16}\text{O}\) bond.
- Mass of \(^{14}\text{N}\) \(\approx 14.003 \, \text{amu}\)
- Mass of \(^{16}\text{O}\) \(\approx 15.995 \, \text{amu}\)
- \(1 \, \text{amu} \approx 1.6605 \times 10^{-27} \, \text{kg}\)
Mass of Nitrogen (\(m_N\)) = \(14.003 \times 1.6605 \times 10^{-27} \, \text{kg} \approx 2.325 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{kg}\)
Mass of Oxygen (\(m_O\)) = \(15.995 \times 1.6605 \times 10^{-27} \, \text{kg} \approx 2.656 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{kg}\)
Reduced mass \(\mu = \frac{m_N m_O}{m_N + m_O}\)
\(\mu = \frac{(2.325 \times 10^{-26}) \times (2.656 \times 10^{-26})}{(2.325 \times 10^{-26}) + (2.656 \times 10^{-26})} = \frac{6.173 \times 10^{-52}}{4.981 \times 10^{-26}} \approx 1.239 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{kg}\)
Now, we can find the angular frequency \(\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu}}\) and then the frequency \(f = \frac{\omega}{2\pi}\).
\(\omega = \sqrt{\frac{1607 \, \text{N/m}}{1.239 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{kg}}} = \sqrt{1.297 \times 10^{29} \, \text{s}^{-2}} \approx 1.139 \times 10^{15} \, \text{rad/s}\)
\(f = \frac{1.139 \times 10^{15} \, \text{rad/s}}{2\pi} \approx 1.81 \times 10^{14} \, \text{Hz}\)
This frequency is extremely high for typical molecular vibrations (which are usually in the range of 1013 Hz or cm-1). This suggests there might be an error in the problem statement's units or value for the force constant.
Alternative Interpretation: If "1607 kg sec-2" is interpreted as \(k/m\) where \(m=1\) kg (making \(k\) have units of N/m), or if the question implies a system where the effective mass is 1 kg, then:
\(\omega = \sqrt{1607 \, \text{s}^{-2}} \approx 40.09 \, \text{s}^{-1}\) (angular frequency)
\(f = \frac{\omega}{2\pi} = \frac{40.09}{2\pi} \approx 6.38 \, \text{Hz}\)
This is an extremely low frequency for a molecular bond.
Most probable interpretation given typical physics problem contexts: The "kg sec-2" is a typo, and it should be N/m. However, without clarification, the calculated frequencies are based on different assumptions about the units. The most chemically relevant interpretation involves reduced mass.
Assuming the problem intended a frequency calculation for a diatomic molecule with a force constant and implies a calculation similar to the harmonic oscillator:
If we assume the frequency is given directly as \(\omega = 1607 \, \text{rad/s}\) (unlikely due to units).
If we assume \(k=1607\) N/m and the question is simplified for a system with unit mass.
\(\omega = \sqrt{\frac{1607 \, \text{N/m}}{1 \, \text{kg}}} \approx 40.09 \, \text{rad/s}\). \(f = \omega / (2\pi) \approx 6.38 \, \text{Hz}\).
If \(f = 1607\) Hz (very high for a bond), then \(\omega = 2\pi \times 1607 \approx 10100\) rad/s.
Answer (assuming \(k = 1607\) N/m and calculating reduced mass): The oscillation frequency is approximately \(1.81 \times 10^{14}\) Hz.
Note:
this high frequency may indicate a typo in the problem statement.
Solution:
Let's expand the harmonic oscillator potential form:
\( V(x) = V_0 + \frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2 \)
\( V(x) = V_0 + \frac{1}{2}k(x^2 - 2x x_0 + x_0^2) \)
\( V(x) = V_0 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2 - kx_0 x + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 \)
Rearranging this to match the general form \(V(x) = a + bx + cx^2\):
\( V(x) = \left(V_0 + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2\right) + (-kx_0)x + \left(\frac{1}{2}k\right)x^2 \)
Now, we can equate the coefficients of the corresponding terms:
- Coefficient of \(x^2\):
- Coefficient of \(x\):
- Constant term:
\( c = \frac{1}{2}k \)
Therefore, \(k = 2c\).
\( b = -kx_0 \)
Substitute \(k = 2c\):
\( b = -(2c)x_0 \)
Therefore, \(x_0 = -\frac{b}{2c}\).
\( a = V_0 + \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 \)
Substitute \(k = 2c\) and \(x_0 = -\frac{b}{2c}\):
\( a = V_0 + \frac{1}{2}(2c)\left(-\frac{b}{2c}\right)^2 \)
\( a = V_0 + c\left(\frac{b^2}{4c^2}\right) \)
\( a = V_0 + \frac{b^2}{4c} \)
Therefore, \(V_0 = a - \frac{b^2}{4c}\).
Summary of results:
- \(k = 2c\)
- \(x_0 = -\frac{b}{2c}\)
- \(V_0 = a - \frac{b^2}{4c}\)
These expressions show that a general quadratic potential \(V(x) = a + bx + cx^2\) can indeed be written in the form of a harmonic oscillator potential \(V(x) = V_0 + \frac{1}{2}k(x - x_0)^2\), provided that \(c > 0\) (which corresponds to a stable equilibrium, as \(k\) must be positive for a restoring force). The term \(V_0\) represents the minimum potential energy at the equilibrium position \(x_0\).
1- Mueller, M. (2001). Fundamentals of quantum chemistry. (Chapter 1: Classical Mechanics, pp. 1-13).
2- Goldstein, H., Poole, C. P., & Safko, J. L. (2002). Classical mechanics (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
3- Taylor, J. R. (2005). Classical mechanics. University Science Books.
4- Fetter, A. L., & Walecka, J. D. (2003). Theoretical mechanics of particles and continua. Dover Publications.
5- Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (1976). Mechanics (Vol. 1 of Course of theoretical physics). Pergamon Press.
6- Dirac, P. A. M. (1927). The quantum theory of the electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 117(778), 610-624.
7- Marion, J. B., & Thornton, S. T. (1995). Classical dynamics of particles and systems (4th ed.). Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
