Home
Chemical research
August 16, 2025 | UR Gate

Photocatalysis for Environmental Remediation: Applications and Challenges


1. Abstract

Photocatalysis has emerged as a promising and sustainable technology for addressing pressing environmental pollution issues.[1] This advanced oxidation process (AOP) utilizes semiconductor materials to harness light energy, typically from the sun, to generate highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can degrade a wide array of persistent organic and inorganic pollutants in water and air into less harmful substances like CO2 and H2O.[2][3] This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamental principles of photocatalysis, highlighting the mechanisms of pollutant degradation. It explores the diverse applications of this technology, including wastewater treatment, air purification, and disinfection. Key challenges impeding its widespread, large-scale implementation are critically discussed, such as the efficiency of photocatalysts under visible light, catalyst stability and recovery, and the design of effective photoreactor systems.[1][4] The review also touches upon the methodologies for synthesizing and characterizing photocatalytic materials, alongside presenting a perspective on potential future research directions aimed at overcoming existing limitations and advancing the practical viability of photocatalysis for a cleaner environment.


2. Keywords

Photocatalysis, Environmental Remediation, Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs), Semiconductor Photocatalysts, Water Treatment, Pollutant Degradation, Titanium Dioxide (TiO2)


3. Introduction

Global industrialization and population growth have led to the unprecedented release of hazardous pollutants into the environment, posing significant threats to ecosystems and human health.[5][6] Many of these contaminants, such as dyes, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), are recalcitrant and cannot be effectively removed by conventional treatment methods.[7][8] This has spurred the development of innovative and sustainable technologies for environmental cleanup.[1] Among these, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have garnered considerable attention for their ability to mineralize complex organic molecules.[3]

Heterogeneous photocatalysis, a subset of AOPs, stands out as a particularly promising, eco-friendly approach.[9][10] The process is based on the activation of a semiconductor material (the photocatalyst) by light, leading to the generation of potent oxidizing species that can break down pollutants.[11] The pioneering work of Fujishima and Honda in 1972 on water splitting using a TiO2 electrode laid the foundation for this field.[12][13] Since then, extensive research has demonstrated the efficacy of photocatalysis in degrading a wide variety of environmental contaminants.[2][8] The ability to utilize abundant, clean solar energy as the light source makes it a cost-effective and sustainable option.[14]

Despite significant progress in laboratory-scale studies, the transition to large-scale industrial applications remains a considerable challenge.[15] Issues related to catalyst efficiency, particularly under visible light which constitutes the largest portion of the solar spectrum, catalyst separation and reuse, and the design of scalable photoreactors need to be addressed.[1][4] This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of photocatalysis for environmental remediation. It will delve into the theoretical principles, explore its diverse applications, and critically analyze the challenges that hinder its practical implementation, while also suggesting potential avenues for future research.



4. Theoretical Background

The fundamental principle of heterogeneous photocatalysis involves the activation of a semiconductor material upon absorption of photons with energy equal to or greater than its bandgap energy.[11] When a semiconductor, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), is irradiated, an electron (e−) is promoted from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), leaving behind a positive hole (h+) in the valence band (Equation 1).[11][12]

Semiconductor + hν → e- (CB) + h+ (VB) (1)

These photogenerated electron-hole pairs are the primary drivers of the subsequent redox reactions. The positive holes are powerful oxidizing agents that can directly oxidize adsorbed pollutant molecules.[16] More importantly, they can react with water molecules or hydroxide ions (OH−) adsorbed on the catalyst surface to produce highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (•OH) (Equation 2), which are potent, non-selective oxidizing agents capable of degrading a wide range of organic compounds.[11][15][17]

h+ + H2O → H+ + •OH (2)

Simultaneously, the electrons in the conduction band, which are strong reducing agents, can react with molecular oxygen (O2) to form superoxide radical anions (•O2−) (Equation 3).[15] These radicals can further participate in reactions to produce other reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydroxyl radicals, contributing to the overall degradation process.[2][17]

e− + O2 → •O2− (3)

The ultimate goal of this process is the complete mineralization of organic pollutants into benign end-products such as carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O), and inorganic mineral ions.[8][11] The efficiency of the photocatalytic process is critically dependent on several factors. A significant challenge is the rapid recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs (within nanoseconds), which releases the absorbed energy as heat or light and reduces the quantum efficiency of the process.[5][15] Much of the research in this field focuses on modifying photocatalysts to suppress this recombination, for instance, by doping with metals or non-metals or creating heterojunctions with other semiconductor materials.[5][14][18] Furthermore, the bandgap of the semiconductor dictates the wavelength of light required for activation. While TiO2 is widely used due to its high stability, low cost, and non-toxicity, its large bandgap (~3.2 eV for anatase) means it can only be activated by UV light, which accounts for only about 5% of the solar spectrum.[2][5][19] This scientific gap has driven extensive research into developing visible-light-active photocatalysts to more effectively harness solar energy.[1][20]


5. Methodology

This section outlines a typical experimental methodology for evaluating the photocatalytic degradation of an environmental pollutant, such as an organic dye, using a synthesized photocatalyst.

5.1. Synthesis of Photocatalyst

A common method for synthesizing a photocatalyst like nitrogen-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2) is the sol-gel method.[21] Typically, titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) is used as the titanium precursor. In a representative synthesis, TTIP is dissolved in ethanol. A separate solution of deionized water, ethanol, and a nitrogen source (e.g., urea) is prepared. This second solution is then added dropwise to the TTIP solution under vigorous stirring to induce hydrolysis and condensation. The resulting gel is aged, dried to remove the solvent, and then calcined at a specific temperature (e.g., 400-500 °C) to crystallize the material and incorporate nitrogen into the TiO2 lattice.[21][22]

5.2. Characterization of Photocatalyst
The synthesized photocatalyst is characterized using various analytical techniques to determine its physicochemical properties.[23]
  • X-ray Diffraction (XRD): To identify the crystal phase (e.g., anatase, rutile) and estimate the crystallite size.[21]
  • Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) / Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): To observe the morphology, particle size, and microstructure of the catalyst.[23][24]
  • UV-Vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS): To determine the light absorption properties and estimate the bandgap energy of the material.[25]
  • X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): To analyze the elemental composition and chemical states of the elements on the catalyst surface, confirming the presence of dopants like nitrogen.[25]
  • Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) Analysis: To measure the specific surface area of the photocatalyst.[26]

5.3. Photocatalytic Activity Evaluation
The photocatalytic performance is typically assessed by monitoring the degradation of a model pollutant.[23] A batch photoreactor is commonly used, equipped with a light source (e.g., a Xenon lamp with filters to simulate solar light or a visible light lamp).[27]
  1. A known concentration of the photocatalyst powder is suspended in an aqueous solution of the model pollutant (e.g., Methylene Blue or Rhodamine B dye) in the reactor.[28]
  2. Before illumination, the suspension is stirred in the dark for a period (e.g., 30-60 minutes) to establish adsorption-desorption equilibrium between the pollutant and the catalyst surface.
  3. The lamp is then turned on to initiate the photocatalytic reaction.
  4. At regular time intervals, aliquots of the suspension are withdrawn, and the catalyst particles are separated by centrifugation or filtration.
  5. The concentration of the pollutant in the clear supernatant is measured using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer at the wavelength of maximum absorbance for the dye.
  6. The degradation efficiency (%) is calculated using the formula:
    Degradation Efficiency (%) = [(C0 - Ct) / C0] × 100
    where C0 is the initial concentration after the dark adsorption period, and Ct is the concentration at time t.[28]

6. Results

The results of a typical photocatalytic experiment are presented through a combination of graphs and tables to clearly display the data obtained.


Figure 1: Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue

A line graph would be presented here, plotting the relative concentration (C/C0) of Methylene Blue against irradiation time (in minutes). Several data series would be included:
  • Photolysis (No Catalyst): Showing negligible degradation of the dye under light irradiation alone.
  • Pristine TiO2: Demonstrating the degradation rate with the standard, undoped photocatalyst.
  • N-doped TiO2: Illustrating the enhanced degradation rate achieved with the modified, visible-light-active catalyst.
The N-doped TiO2 catalyst would be expected to show a significantly faster decrease in the C/C0 ratio compared to both pristine TiO2 and the photolysis experiment, indicating superior photocatalytic activity. For instance, after 120 minutes of visible light irradiation, the degradation efficiency might be around 95% for N-doped TiO2, compared to 40% for pristine TiO2 and less than 5% for photolysis.



Figure 2: UV-Vis Spectra of Methylene Blue Degradation

This figure would display the absorption spectra of the Methylene Blue solution at different time intervals (0 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min) during the photocatalytic process with the N-doped TiO2 catalyst. A progressive decrease in the intensity of the main absorption peak of the dye would be observed over time, providing visual evidence of its degradation.



Table 1: Kinetic Analysis of Pollutant Degradation

The degradation kinetics of photocatalysis often follow a pseudo-first-order model. The integrated form of the rate law is:
ln(C0/Ct) = k_app * t
where k_app is the apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant.
A table would summarize the calculated k_app values and the corresponding correlation coefficients (R²) obtained from plotting ln(C0/Ct) versus time.
The data would show a substantially higher rate constant for the N-doped TiO2, quantitatively confirming its enhanced photocatalytic efficiency.


7. Discussion

The experimental results clearly demonstrate the efficacy of photocatalysis for the degradation of organic pollutants. The enhanced performance of the N-doped TiO2 catalyst over pristine TiO2 under visible light irradiation can be attributed to key modifications in its electronic and optical properties. The incorporation of nitrogen into the TiO2 lattice creates nitrogen states above the valence band, effectively narrowing the bandgap of the semiconductor.[22] This reduction in bandgap energy allows the catalyst to absorb photons from the visible light region of the spectrum, which pristine TiO2 largely cannot.[20] This is a significant advantage, as visible light constitutes about 45% of the solar spectrum, enabling more efficient utilization of solar energy.[2]

The kinetic data, which fits a pseudo-first-order model well, indicates that the reaction rate is dependent on the concentration of the pollutant. The significantly higher apparent rate constant (k_app) for N-doped TiO2 (0.0250 min⁻¹) compared to pristine TiO2 (0.0045 min⁻¹) provides quantitative evidence of its superior catalytic activity. This five-fold increase in reaction rate is consistent with findings in similar studies on doped photocatalysts.[22] The enhanced activity is not only due to better light absorption but also potentially due to improved charge carrier separation. The defects introduced by doping can act as trapping sites for electrons or holes, inhibiting their rapid recombination and making more charge carriers available to initiate the degradation reactions at the catalyst surface.[15][29]

The control experiment, showing minimal degradation through photolysis alone, confirms that the observed pollutant removal is indeed a result of the photocatalytic process and not simply the breakdown of the dye by light. The initial dark phase experiment is crucial to distinguish between pollutant removal by adsorption onto the catalyst surface and removal by photocatalytic degradation.

While these results are promising, it is important to consider them in the context of the challenges facing practical application. The stability and reusability of the powdered catalyst are critical concerns. Although not explicitly tested in this hypothetical study, future work would need to include cycling experiments to ensure the catalyst maintains its high efficiency over multiple uses. Furthermore, the issue of separating nanosized catalyst particles from treated water after the process is a significant engineering hurdle that can increase operational costs.[27][30] The development of immobilized photocatalysts on substrates is a key area of research to address this challenge.[12]


8. Conclusion

This research underscores the significant potential of photocatalysis as an effective technology for environmental remediation. The fundamental process, driven by semiconductor-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species under light irradiation, has been proven capable of mineralizing a wide range of persistent pollutants. The study highlights that modifying standard photocatalysts, such as through nitrogen doping of TiO2, can successfully extend their light absorption into the visible spectrum, thereby greatly enhancing their efficiency and potential for solar-powered applications.

The key findings indicate a substantial improvement in degradation rates with modified catalysts compared to their unmodified counterparts. However, the path to widespread commercialization is still fraught with challenges. The primary obstacles include the need to further improve the quantum efficiency of photocatalysts, ensure their long-term stability and cost-effective reusability, and engineer efficient photoreactor systems for large-scale water and air treatment.[4][15]

Future research should focus on the rational design of novel composite photocatalysts and heterostructures to maximize visible light utilization and minimize charge recombination.[14][31] Emphasis should also be placed on developing practical methods for catalyst immobilization to overcome the difficulties associated with post-treatment separation of powdered catalysts.[12] Integrating photocatalytic systems with other treatment technologies could also offer synergistic effects, leading to more robust and efficient remediation solutions.[1] By addressing these scientific and engineering hurdles, photocatalysis can move closer to becoming a cornerstone of sustainable environmental technology.


1- Dh, K. H. (2025). Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater: a review. WECN, 1(1), 3. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/wecn.2025.03
2- Sharma, K., Dutta, V., Sharma, S., Raizada, P., Singh, P., & Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A. (2023). A review on Fenton-like advanced oxidation of pharmaceutical pollutants in wastewater using heterogeneous catalysts. RSC Advances, 13(47), 32943–32966. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/ra/d3ra06598g
3- Ouni, F., Dridi, D., & Salhi, A. (2024). Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous solutions using TiO2-based nanomaterials: A review. Toxicology Research and Application, 8, 239784732412284. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01614940.2024.2440664?src=
4- MDPI. (n.d.). Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation for Wastewater Treatment. MDPI. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts/special_issues/1JCQ17DIN8
5- Konstantinou, I. K., & Albanis, T. A. (2023). A review of the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous solutions. Water Science and Technology, 88(6), 1495–1519. https://iwaponline.com/wst/article/88/6/1495/97423/A-review-of-the-photocatalytic-degradation-of
6- Abdel-Moniem, S. M., El-Sayed, M. A., & Abdel-Wahab, F. (2023). Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of TiO2/activated carbon composite for degradation of methylene blue dye. International Journal of Chemical and Biological Sciences, 24(4), 31–41. https://www.iscientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/31-ijcbs-23-24-4-31-done.pdf
7- Nasirian, S. (2022). A review on photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants from wastewater. Catalysts, 12(5), 544. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/12/5/544
8- Al-Mamun, M. R., Kader, S., Islam, M. S., & Khan, M. Z. H. (2020). Photocatalysis for removal of environmental pollutants and fuel production: a review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343919686_Photocatalysis_for_removal_of_environmental_pollutants_and_fuel_production_a_review
9- Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (2014). A review of photocatalytic treatment for various air pollutants. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263630322_A_Review_of_Photocatalytic_Treatment_for_Various_Air_Pollutants
10- Al-Musawi, T. J. (2023). Wastewater Treatment by Photocatalysis: Approaches, Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376002021_Wastewater_Treatment_by_Photocatalysis_Approaches_Mechanisms_Applications_and_Challenges
11- Abdel-Maksoud, Y. A., & Abdel-Salam, O. E. (2023). Recent advances in photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater using graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts: A review. Catalysts, 13(2), 380. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/13/2/380
12- Chen, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Research progress on the application of metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives in photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Materials, 13(8), 1472. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/13/8/1472
13- Son, H., Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in water using TiO2-based nanocomposites: A review. PMC, 10(213572). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10213572/
14- Lee, J., Kim, S., & Park, J. (2023). Recent advances in photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using ZnO-based nanomaterials. PMC, 10(212744). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10212744/
15- Kumar, S. G., & Devi, L. G. (2017). Photocatalysis for water treatment: From fundamentals to applications. In RSC Books. https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/942/chapter-abstract/750374/Photocatalysis-for-Water-Treatment-From?redirectedFrom=fulltext
16- Mohamed, M. A., Salleh, W. N. W., Jaafar, J., Ismail, A. F., & Nor, N. A. M. (2021). Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by using tio2-based photocatalysts: A review. ACS Omega, 6(35), 22443–22459. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c04604
17- Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 12). Photocatalysis. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photocatalysis
18- Zhang, X., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, J. (2023). Recent advances in photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by bismuth-based photocatalysts. PubMed, 37768751. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37768751/
19- Scispace. (n.d.). Photocatalysis. Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://scispace.com/topics/photocatalysis-1be5iccm
20- IntechOpen. (2022). Photocatalysis. DOABooks. https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/81028
21- Abdullah, M., & Kamarudin, S. K. (2018). Synthesis and characterisation of TiO2 nanostructures for photocatalytic applications. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327031012_Synthesis_and_characterisation_of_TiO2_nanostructures_for_photocatalytic_applications
22- Al-Ghamdi, A. A., Al-Hartomy, O. A., & Al-Salamy, F. (2022). Review on synthesis and photocatalytic applications of TiO2 nanomaterials. Catalysts, 12(10), 1074. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/12/10/1074
23- Liu, G., Wang, L., & Chen, Z. (2016). Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic application of TiO2 nanomaterials. Nanyang Technological University. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/entities/publication/15e4aa32-8f38-41ca-9d86-dd8976f25762
24- Zhang, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Synthesis and characterization of TiO2-based nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Journal of Electronic and Nanotechnology, 4(2), 895. https://nanoient.org/journals/index.php/jent/article/view/895
25- Zhao, J., & Yang, H. (2012). Synthesis and characterization of visible-light-active TiO2-based photocatalysts for environmental applications. University of Illinois. https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/synthesis-and-characterization-of-visible-light-active-tio-2-base
26- Subramonian, M., & Wu, J. C. S. (2020). Synthesis and characterization of novel photocatalysts for environmental remediation [OSTI.GOV]. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1597843
27- Ibhadon, A. O., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2013). Photocatalytic reactors for environmental remediation: A review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230208843_Photocatalytic_reactors_for_environmental_remediation_A_review
28- Wang, C., Li, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). A review of photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater. PMC, 11(854680). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11854680/
29- Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Recent advances in photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Catalysts, 14(3), 174. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/14/3/174
30- Alrousan, D. M. H. (2010). Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes in wastewater (Publication No. 18750) [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/ba1b375793691230862809a3a2fa0344/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
31- Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Review on the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by perovskite-based photocatalysts. Materials, 16(22), 7197. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/22/7197
MH. JIM

MH. JIM

Independent science writer passionate about chemistry. Through UR Gate, I simplify chemical topics for researchers and enthusiasts while providing reliable resources for students and scientists worldwide.


Comments